Better-resource / outdated-content swap sequence

I'm doing link building for {{your_asset}} at {{your_company}}.

Pull my Hunter list {{list_name_or_url}} — pages linking to a weaker or outdated resource (or citing an old stat). For each, compliment the article, name specifically what their current link misses or how old the data is ([[what's outdated]]), and position my deeper, fresher asset as the better swap — with proof ([[data point or scale]]). Soft, face-saving ask.

Draft a 2-touch sequence, verify addresses, and build it in Hunter for my review.

Grounded in Hunter's link-building templates "Regarding One of Your Articles", "Blog post update?", "Fascinating data & charts": outdated/weaker link → better resource → "Would you be open to linking to us instead?" Note: several ship as worked examples with real URLs baked in — use the arc, not the copy.

Ensure the copy is real, human, and avoids any AI tell-tale signs, including em-dashes, staccato sentences, and unnatural language like: carry, shipped, ask etc.

Run every prompt on this page from your AI assistant.

Connect Hunter to Claude, ChatGPT, or Perplexity. Every prompt below runs on your Hunter account and returns verified contacts with provenance attached, so your assistant knows where each one came from and how confident it should be before acting.